Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - troffasky

#121
General Support / Stacked charts vs inverted values
November 29, 2015, 06:31:13 PM
It seems to me that inverting values on a chart prevents the values from being stacked.
Four WAN interfaces on one firewall, plotted on one chart. The positive DCIs seem to be stacked correctly but negatively is not. Alternatively, I might be misunderstanding how stacked graphs should work.
#122
General Support / Re: NetXMS - multiple config questions
November 29, 2015, 06:26:24 PM
OK, fits my observations :-)
#123
General Support / Re: NetXMS - multiple config questions
November 29, 2015, 04:48:00 PM
Solved it - changed {instance-name} to {instance} and it works...although it's not quite what I'd expected. {instance} should be the ifIndex rather than the ifName, surely?
#124
General Support / Re: NetXMS - multiple config questions
November 29, 2015, 01:37:59 AM
Quote from: tomaskir on November 10, 2015, 01:12:02 PM
Quote from: name29 on November 09, 2015, 10:55:28 PM

But if i set the title of the Graph to "Traffic on {instance-name} - bits/s" but netxms don't parse the {instance-name} value.
Which NetXMS version are you using?
What does a walk on .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1 show?

I'm having this exact problem with 2.0rc2. I have created a template pretty much as described in this thread, appled it to an Ubiquiti Edgeswitch and on the perfomance tab I now have ~30 graphs called "Traffic on {instance-name}".

What parameters are supported in the Title field? I would like to add the ifAlias as well, if possible.
What did name29 do to get it working?
Walk from the above OID looks like this:

.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.1 [STRING]: 0/1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.2 [STRING]: 0/2
...
.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.26 [STRING]: 0/26
.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.65 [STRING]: CPU Interface:  5/1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.66 [STRING]: 3/1
...
.1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1.71 [STRING]: 3/6



#125
At the time this was logged, neither the node nor the zone had a proxy configured, but the zone does now have this particular agent as its proxy [as that was my original intention] and it's working fine now.
#126
General Support / Re: Rediscovering my discovery
November 26, 2015, 12:42:56 AM
Filter not matched means the host is accepted, not rejected?

I will re-order the communities in the SNMP settings and....well, I was going to say try again but it seems you just leave it and it does recovery by itself. I know SNMP works on all these devices because I am already monitoring them with SNMP from the same server with Zabbix.
#127
Feature Requests / Apply template group to node
November 21, 2015, 11:18:41 AM
Would be good to be able to apply a template group to a host as well as individual templates. That way common objects can be split across templates rather than duplicating objects on each template.
#128
General Support / Re: Rediscovering my discovery
November 21, 2015, 12:34:48 AM
OK, I don't get it. Why wouldn't 172.26.1.3/32 match a filter of 172.26.1.0/24? Is it because the  the subnet doesn't match the zone?

All the agents have a community string of 'public' which is on my list of strings in the SNMP Credentials.
#129
General Support / Rediscovering my discovery
November 20, 2015, 08:23:06 PM
I had discovery running a few days ago:

[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.433] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.3): auto filter, flags=0003
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.482] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.3): auto filter - bResult=0
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.482] [DEBUG] NodePoller: processing node 172.26.1.4/32 in zone 0
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.482] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.4): auto filter, flags=0003
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.532] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.4): auto filter - bResult=0
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.532] [DEBUG] NodePoller: processing node 172.26.1.5/32 in zone 0
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.532] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.5): auto filter, flags=0003
[17-Nov-2015 07:38:13.582] [DEBUG] AcceptNewNode(172.26.1.5): auto filter - bResult=0
...
[17-Nov-2015 07:53:20.632] [DEBUG] Finished active discovery check on range 172.26.1.1 - 172.26.1.255


What does flags=0003 and bResult=0 mean? I have Network Discovery configured for Active and Passive and 172.26.1.0/24 is in the Active Discovery Targets, but the above three nodes haven't been added. Also, 172.26.1.0/24 is in zone 11 not zone 0.

Since then I have restarted the netxmsd service and I haven't seen any more active discovery messages. Can I force an active discovery? In the Server Configuration, ActiveNetworkDiscovery = 1 which I assume means 'on'.
#130
General Support / Agent wouldn't return values
November 19, 2015, 04:04:06 PM
Server: 192.168.160.1
Agent: 192.168.160.3
Version: 2.0-RC2

Agent config file:


# Log File
LogFile=/var/log/nxagentd
DebugLevel = 3
# IP white list, can contain multiple records separated by comma.
# CIDR notation supported for subnets.
MasterServers=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.160.1/32

RequireAuthentication = no
EnableProxy = yes
EnableSNMPProxy = yes



Added agent to server as a new node. Can see details in Overview. Can't poll anything from node though:


[2015.11.19 13:43:33] **** Poll request sent to server ****
[2015.11.19 13:43:33] Poll request accepted
[2015.11.19 13:43:33] Starting configuration poll for node monitoring.xxx.local
[2015.11.19 13:43:33] Checking node's capabilities...
[2015.11.19 13:43:33] Capability check finished
[2015.11.19 13:43:33] Checking interface configuration...
[2015.11.19 13:43:39] Unable to get interface list from node
[2015.11.19 13:43:43] Interface configuration check finished
[2015.11.19 13:43:43] Checking node name
[2015.11.19 13:43:43] Node name is OK
[2015.11.19 13:43:43] Reading list of installed software packages
[2015.11.19 13:43:43] Unable to get information about installed software packages
[2015.11.19 13:43:54] Finished configuration poll for node monitoring.xxx.local
[2015.11.19 13:43:54] Node configuration was not changed after poll
[2015.11.19 13:43:54] **** Poll completed successfully ****


I can use nxget to fetch info:


# nxget 192.168.160.3 'Net.Interface.Description(eth0)'
eth0


Turn up debugging on agent to 5, restart agent, try again:


[19-Nov-2015 13:42:59.183] [INFO ] NetXMS Agent started
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:02.576] [DEBUG] Incoming connection from 192.168.160.1
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:02.576] [DEBUG] Connection from 192.168.160.1 accepted
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:02.659] [DEBUG] Incoming connection from 192.168.160.3
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:03.091] [DEBUG] Connection from 192.168.160.3 rejected
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:03.091] [DEBUG] [session:0] Established proxy connection to 192.168.160.3:4700
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:03.091] [DEBUG] [session:0] CommSession::disconnect()
...repeats...
[19-Nov-2015 13:43:58.190] [DEBUG] [session:0] Session with 192.168.160.1 closed


...so it's using itself as a proxy to talk to itself, but not from 127.0.0.1, from its interface that faces the server.

Is this the expected behaviour? The zone that it's in *did* have this server set up as the default proxy for the zone, but I put it back after it stopped working [I guess I know why now]. Checked the node's properties, it is not configured to use itself to poll itself.
#131
Right now [2.0rc2] the management console window title is "NetXMS Management Console". I think it would be sensible to add [either by default or otherwise] the hostname of the server you're connected to and the user you're logged in as [username@hostname].

Another that might be useful is the number of unacked alarms.