Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - jdowney

#16
Thanks, Victor that's helpful info.
#17
Should all agents in each zone have the Zone ID specified? Or just the machines that are being used as proxies?

Also am I correctly in thinking the proxy's cache Syslog and SNMP traps etc when a link to the master server is lost?

John
#18
Thanks Tomaskir working now!

;D
#19
Thanks, Victor!  :D
#20
Thanks,

EnableSyslogProxy = yes

Anything wrong with this using - NetXMS agent 2.1-M2 (windows) Please see attached.
#21
I know this is an old post. Has Syslog proxy been implemented? Also Tomaskir what OS do you have running on your Raspberry Pi's?

Thanks
#22
Hi,

Currently, we use the follow message text in the Threshold Recovery text field for emails:-

Threshold recovery %n \n%a \n%m  \n %t \n

We would also like to include the last value for the DCI which has recovered but unable to work out what the code will be to do this.

Anyone able to point us in the right direction.

John
#23
General Support / Re: Documentation
October 25, 2017, 11:09:55 AM
Also agree with this.

Regards

John
#24
Afternoon

I'm been searching High and now and can't find anywhere mentioned. What code do we need to use so can we can see either the data collection comment when threshold mail is sent out or node comment when node down email is sent out.

Currently using the following code for action message text - Threshold warning %n \n%a \n%m  \n %t \n

Regards

John
#25
General Support / Monitoring multiple sites
April 05, 2017, 01:39:30 PM
Hi

we have multiple sites which we monitor as well as hosts at each of the sites. These sites are connected via VPN or point to point link. What is the recommended way to set this up so if either VPN or Point to point link goes down then alerts are not sent out for each host but an alert sent out for the site. We are currently running - 2.1-M2.

And secondly I notice in the change logs for 2.1-M3  the following is mentioned -  Improved event correlation based on network topology
Could you provide more details on what this means.

Thanks in advanced.
#26
Thanks have managed to create a work around for the time being until this implemented :-

For anyone else who wants to see how's this is done for a cisco switch port (C2960) looking to implement on other cisco including 3750G / 3560G /

https://www.netxms.org/forum/configuration/transformation-scripts-link-speed-cisco/
#27
Feature Requests / Expected link speed - Switch port
April 04, 2017, 01:44:32 PM
Hi

The expected link Up / Down / Ignore feature is great. It would also be helpful to have expected link speed also configurable for switch ports i.e 10 Gbps / 1 Gbps / 100 Mbps / 10 Mbps and Ignore. This would help when devices incorrectly negotiate there desired speeds.

Thanks
#28
Thanks a lot this has resolved our issue with overnight daily reboots.
:)
John
#29
Thanks this is perfect and resolved our issue.

John
#30
Good Evening,

I'm using the following SNMP  -  .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.10101 to pull down the link speed of a port on as Cisco switch. as we want to be alerted if any device is not running at 1 Gigabit. Unfortunately Cisco send this in different format.  Meaning if you have a Gigabit port and it is connected at 100 Mbps, you will get 100,000,000.  If it is connected at 10 Mbps, you will get 10,000,000, and if it is connected at Gigabit, you get 1,000,000,000.

So I've tried to create a transformation script to convert :-

if ($1 = 1000000000)
return "1 Gbps";
if ($1 = 100000000)
return "100 Mbps";
if ($1 = 10000000)
return "10 Mbps";


This does not seem to be working it always returns 1 Gbps regardless of what the value is. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.