There are conflicts between some internal routing subnets (10.0.0.0/30) and customers' interfaces for NAT (10.0.0.0/24, 10.0.0.0/8 and other ideas), and this generates alerts about invalid netmask.
- Welcome to NetXMS Support Forum.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#32
General Support / Re: XMPP delays.
December 28, 2014, 04:42:08 PM
Relevant log entries below.
Please note, that almost 2 minutes passed between posting the message (15:34:51) and effectively sending it out (15:36:37).
Any ideas?
Please note, that almost 2 minutes passed between posting the message (15:34:51) and effectively sending it out (15:36:37).
Any ideas?
Code Select
[28-Dec-2014 15:34:51.911] [DEBUG] Finished status poll for node 999999-TestNode (ID: 323)
[28-Dec-2014 15:34:51.911] [DEBUG] *actions* Executing action 1 (XMPP Test) of type XMPP MESSAGE
[28-Dec-2014 15:34:51.911] [DEBUG] *actions* Sending XMPP message to [JID1];[JID2]: "999999-TestNode - Node down"
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:01.435] [DEBUG] XMPP: RECV: <presence id="7QoiO-274" to="[NetXMS-JID]/20892836741419736745627465" from="[JID2]/androidO2Mp615A"><status/><priority>11</priority><show>away</show><c hash="sha-1" xmlns="http://jabber.org/protocol/caps" ver="xYEd+1ZdePfGl3AaJ23FB7rizRg=" node="http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/smack/"/></presence>
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:26.959] [DEBUG] Node 323 "999999-TestNode" queued for status poll
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:26.960] [DEBUG] Starting status poll for node 999999-TestNode (ID: 323)
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:26.960] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): check SNMP
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:28.961] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): SNMP check finished
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:46.964] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): bAllDown=true, dynFlags=0x00001015
[28-Dec-2014 15:35:46.964] [DEBUG] Finished status poll for node 999999-TestNode (ID: 323)
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:17.055] [DEBUG] Node 323 "999999-TestNode" queued for status poll
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:17.055] [DEBUG] Starting status poll for node 999999-TestNode (ID: 323)
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:17.055] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): check SNMP
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:19.058] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): SNMP check finished
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:37.063] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(999999-TestNode): bAllDown=true, dynFlags=0x00001015
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:37.063] [DEBUG] Finished status poll for node 999999-TestNode (ID: 323)
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:37.324] [DEBUG] XMPP: SENT: <message to="[JID1]" type="chat"><body>999999-TestNode - Node down</body></message>
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:37.324] [DEBUG] XMPP: SENT: <message to="[JID2]" type="chat"><body>999999-TestNode - Node down</body></message>
[28-Dec-2014 15:36:37.324] [DEBUG] CorrelateEvent: event SYS_SNMP_UNREACHABLE id 2313744 source 999999-TestNode [323]
#33
General Support / Re: Node groups
December 28, 2014, 04:01:58 PM
Yeah, whole-night marathon was quite fun and educating. I'm starting to feel at home 
Is there some donate link or subscription of some kind, like in observium?
Is there some donate link or subscription of some kind, like in observium?
#34
General Support / Re: Node groups
December 28, 2014, 02:12:33 AM
Answering myself, I think what I'm looking for are containers and templates. The question is: can a node be in multiple containers?
#35
General Support / Node groups
December 28, 2014, 01:48:46 AM
I'd like to differentiate between nodes in some way, to make things easier in for example DCI department.
For example, I'd like to have routers, switches and power supplies, so I can monitor for example latency/packet loss to routers, mains and battery voltage/amperage on power supplies, and setup correct alarms for nodes in groups. Is this possible without writing a lot of scripts?
For example, I'd like to have routers, switches and power supplies, so I can monitor for example latency/packet loss to routers, mains and battery voltage/amperage on power supplies, and setup correct alarms for nodes in groups. Is this possible without writing a lot of scripts?
#36
General Support / XMPP delays.
December 28, 2014, 01:27:53 AM
I've successfully setup XMPP alerting (no thanks to the documentation, which is quite lacking in this department.)
Big kudos for supporting XMPP out of the box
However, there are long delays between log information about sending message and effectively sending the message. Did I do something wrong? I'm sending the message via action configured in event processing policy.
Big kudos for supporting XMPP out of the box
However, there are long delays between log information about sending message and effectively sending the message. Did I do something wrong? I'm sending the message via action configured in event processing policy.
#37
General Support / Re: Network Discovery options [SOLVED]
December 28, 2014, 01:25:58 AM
Could this be fixed? Adding and removing subnets doesn't seem to be efficient way to do it. NetXMS adds our customers' networks with wrong subnets, which results in alerts about them.