Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Dani@M3T

#331
We have nodes (HPserver) with DCIs only on the node itself but with Proxy nodes (iLO). Now Instance discovery is not working in DCIs (SNMP) on nodes (HPserver) with Proxy nodes (iLO). No instances are generated (I started configuration polls). The DCI is a simple SNMP one and the discovery is simple SNMP-Walk-OID on the same OID with no filtering script.
Is instance discovery not possible with Proxy nodes on the DCI?
#332
When I delete DCIs from templates (not from nodes) I always get errors like this:

Critical SYS_DB_QUERY_FAILED Database query failed (Query: DELETE FROM idata_1174 WHERE item_id=1354; Error: 42P01 ERROR:  relation "idata_1174" does not exist
LINE 1: DELETE FROM idata_1174 WHERE item_id=1354
Critical SYS_DB_QUERY_FAILED Database query failed (Query: DELETE FROM idata_384 WHERE item_id=526; Error: 42P01 ERROR:  relation "idata_384" does not exist
LINE 1: DELETE FROM idata_384 WHERE item_id=526
Critical SYS_DB_QUERY_FAILED Database query failed (Query: DELETE FROM idata_1139 WHERE item_id=825; Error: 42P01 ERROR:  relation "idata_1139" does not exist
LINE 1: DELETE FROM idata_1139 WHERE item_id=825


It's for older and for newly created DCIs in templates. NetXMS is V1.2.14.
#333
Feature Requests / Re: Plan for IPV6 in NetXMS?
June 21, 2014, 11:03:16 AM
Ok thanks for your information. Some people asked me why NetXMS still only supports IPV4.
#334
I thought too that should be the normal behaviour. So I wait with the next image changes for V1.2.15. Thanks.
#335
I know and I tried that before (topology polls). But the old link information stays on both switches for ever. So it's maybe a bug.
#336
Feature Requests / Plan for IPV6 in NetXMS?
June 20, 2014, 02:24:24 PM
What is the plan for IPV6 support in NetXMS?
#337
We changed the connection between two LLDP-capable switches:

First Switch1-Port7 connected to Switch2-Port1,
Then we changed to Switch1-Port2 connected to Switch2-Port8.

Now in [Object Details] - [Interfaces] of node Switch1 I can see Switch2 connected to Port 2 AND 7. the same MAC and the same IP-Addresse and Peer Discovery on both interfaces = LLDP. The same on Switch2.
When I look at [Tools] - [Info] - [Topology Table (LLDP)] there is only the new connection.

Is there something like a Lease Time for LLDP information?
#338
It would be helpfull to change the image file (png) of an existing Image in the image library. So no nodes must be reconfigured. If you choose 'edit' of an image in image library you can choose another image file but on 'Ok' you get the error message "Image xy in Network Objects category already exists."
#339
Hi Victor

Thank's for the fast help. Now it starts. Then I tested the new function with the new parameter of Event SYS_NODE_UP with a filter script ($1 != 1). Works exactly like expected! That will help me a lot! Now I revert to V1.2.14 again. For production I will wait for V1.2.15

Dani
#340
you mean?:
nxdbmgr -X upgrade? (that results in an endless loop)
i stopped this and then: nxdbmgr batch script.sql (where I copied the two lines in)
But netxmsd doesn't start
#341
Thanks. I tried V1.2.15-M1. Compile ok, but in DB upgrading from version 321 to 322:
SQL query failed (42601 ERROR:  syntax error at or near "ALTERT"
LINE 1: ALTER TABLE users ALTERT COLUMN system_access TYPE bigint
                          ^):
ALTER TABLE users ALTERT COLUMN system_access TYPE bigint


#342
ok. The documentation is still one of the weakest points of NetXMS. I'm not fit enough on NetXMS otherwise I would help with documentation.
#343
Thanks for the detailed explanation. At the moment I don't have such a case. But maybe later. Is it already in documentation?
#344
In Node Properties on register 'Communications' is an option 'This is address of remote management node'.
What is this for. I didn't found it in the documentation. And I can't remember it was there before.

Thanks
#345
Wow, thank's.
Is it possible to allready have the changed source file for tests? (as I allways compile from sources on Linux x64)

Thank's
Dani