I agree that making SYS_THRESHOLD_REARMED to have less parameters than threshold violation event was a bad decision. The best option probably could be changing it to have same parameters in same order as SYS_THRESHOLD_REACHED, but this will broke compatibility with existing setups. Compatibility will be retained if we add missing parameters at the end, but as same data will be at different places for reach and rearm events, this may cause additional configuration errors. I'll do something with it in 1.1.4, but I don't decide exact solution yet.
Best regards,
Victor
Best regards,
Victor