News:

We really need your input in this questionnaire

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - testos

#91
General Support / Re: NetXMS sever 1.1.1 crash
May 20, 2011, 11:02:25 AM
Okay, I've replaced the file you tell me and recompiled server.

Thanks.
Best regards.
#92
General Support / Re: Downgrade database
May 20, 2011, 09:52:18 AM
Hi.

QuoteYou can try to execute the following SQL script to downgrade database:

DROP TABLE ap_common
...;

Is valid this script for downgrade database from 1.1.1 to 1.1.0?

For these situations, it would be nice nxdbmgr tool had a downgrade option

Best regards.
#93
General Support / Re: NetXMS sever 1.1.1 crash
May 19, 2011, 02:38:14 PM

I want to clarify that server daemon process does not down.
No dump files are generated  (.info and .mdmp extensions).
#94
General Support / NetXMS sever 1.1.1 crash
May 19, 2011, 02:20:28 PM
Hi.

Since I installed 1.1.1 server version, from time to time NetXMS console shows entire all nodes become to down simultaneously and do not respond to pol status. So then I restart the server and everything returns to normal ... until it happens again.

This is part of my netxmsd.log:

Quote[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Unable to create raw socket for ICMP protocol
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Error returned by accept() system call: Too many open files
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Error returned by accept() system call: Too many open files
[19-May-2011 12:48:15] Client session closed due to communication error (Success)
[19-May-2011 12:48:16] Error returned by accept() system call: Too many open files
[19-May-2011 12:48:16] Client session closed due to communication error (Success)
[19-May-2011 12:48:16] Error returned by accept() system call: Too many open files



Is it advisable rollback server previous version?


Best regards.
#95
Hi Victor.

I managed to solve this problem by reinstalling NetXMS server v1.1.1 again from sources  ???.

Thank you for your help
#96
Hi.

Problem persist in 1.1.1 version.

Best regards.
#97
Feature Requests / Object properties
May 18, 2011, 12:38:56 PM
Hi.

You probably already thought so for the new console, but I suggest a double-clicking on an object for display their properties. Also, if object is a node, in the properties left menu, it should add an option to manage one or more DCI's simultaneously (active, disable, edit, delete, etc. on selected group) and another to manage one or more interfaces simultaneously (manage, unmanage, delete, create DCIs for interfaces, etc. on selected group).


Best regards.
#98
Announcements / Re: NetXMS 1.1.1 released
May 18, 2011, 11:32:44 AM
Hi Victor.

Thanks, You're doing a great job again.
Many new implementations...New NetXMS Management Console is already very much operational (90%?)  :o.

Each new NetXMS version more like it

Best regards.
#99
Feature Requests / Re: Event list
April 08, 2011, 10:38:10 AM
Hi!

I also seem right these suggestions. File->Export menu is grayed out in my system, constantly.

Best regards.
#100
Hi!

I can reproduce such problem in a Cisco A.S.A. firewall. NetXMS reports "Unable to get interface list from node" from Poll -> Interfaces names.

Snmpwalk command retrieve interfaces names from NetXMS server:
Quote[root@GesRed2 ~]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c xxxxxxx 10.1x.xxx.xxx | grep -i ifName   
IF-MIB::ifName.1 = STRING: port1
IF-MIB::ifName.2 = STRING: port2
IF-MIB::ifName.3 = STRING: port3
IF-MIB::ifName.4 = STRING: port4
IF-MIB::ifName.5 = STRING: port5
IF-MIB::ifName.6 = STRING: port6
IF-MIB::ifName.7 = STRING: port7
IF-MIB::ifName.8 = STRING: port8
IF-MIB::ifName.9 = STRING: port9
IF-MIB::ifName.10 = STRING: port10
IF-MIB::ifName.11 = STRING: ssl.root
IF-MIB::ifName.12 = STRING: SLB_LexWeb
IF-MIB::ifName.13 = STRING: FirePass_Ext
IF-MIB::ifName.14 = STRING: SLB_LexWebAdmin
IF-MIB::ifName.15 = STRING: ABO_IREGES
IF-MIB::ifName.16 = STRING: MUGEJU_sede_ele
IF-MIB::ifName.17 = STRING: SLB_PortalesExt

[root@GesRed2 ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c  xxxxxxx 10.1x.xxx.xxx | grep -i ifName   
IF-MIB::ifName.1 = STRING: port1
IF-MIB::ifName.2 = STRING: port2
IF-MIB::ifName.3 = STRING: port3
IF-MIB::ifName.4 = STRING: port4
IF-MIB::ifName.5 = STRING: port5
IF-MIB::ifName.6 = STRING: port6
IF-MIB::ifName.7 = STRING: port7
IF-MIB::ifName.8 = STRING: port8
IF-MIB::ifName.9 = STRING: port9
IF-MIB::ifName.10 = STRING: port10
IF-MIB::ifName.11 = STRING: ssl.root
IF-MIB::ifName.12 = STRING: SLB_LexWeb
IF-MIB::ifName.13 = STRING: FirePass_Ext
IF-MIB::ifName.14 = STRING: SLB_LexWebAdmin
IF-MIB::ifName.15 = STRING: ABO_IREGES
IF-MIB::ifName.16 = STRING: MUGEJU_sede_ele
IF-MIB::ifName.17 = STRING: SLB_PortalesExt

[root@GesRed2 ~]#


Best Regards.
#101
General Support / Re: nxmibc error compilation
March 14, 2011, 12:42:52 PM
Hi Victor.

You were right again. I had broken "SNMPv2-SMI.txt" file.
nxmibc tool work fine again.

thx
#102
General Support / nxmibc error compilation
March 11, 2011, 11:37:01 AM
Hi,

nxmibc tool can not resolve import symbols:

QuoteResolving imports:
   ACCOUNTING-CONTROL-MIB
ACCOUNTING-CONTROL-MIB: ERROR 001: Import symbol "MODULE-IDENTITY" unresolved

QuoteResolving imports:
   IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-NUMBERS-MIB
IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-NUMBERS-MIB: ERROR 001: Import symbol "MODULE-IDENTITY" unresolved

QuoteResolving imports:
   FORTINET-CORE-MIB
FORTINET-CORE-MIB: ERROR 001: Import symbol "Integer32" unresolved

...etc.


This was right compiled in previous NetXMS version.

Best regards.
#103
Feature Requests / Auto binding containers
March 07, 2011, 12:11:52 PM

Hi!

Would be nice to do automatic container binding to others containers based on filters scripts, in addition to the current automatic nodes binding . For example we could use this container filtering script:

Quote$container->name == "OAJ_94" || $container->name == "ContainerExample"

Best regards.
#104
Announcements / Re: NetXMS 1.1.0 released
March 04, 2011, 09:56:54 AM
Hi Victor.

Thank you for your answers, it seems that NetXMS will be one of the best, soon.

Best regards.
#105
Hi!

Please, could you tell me why Icmp.LastPingTime and Icmp.AvgPingTime parameters return response times don't match with ping command?

This is the output for linux ping command:
[root@NetFlow1 ~]# ping -v -i 10 10.45.252.62
PING 10.45.252.62 (10.45.252.62) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=75.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=76.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=81.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=4 ttl=250 time=81.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=5 ttl=250 time=80.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=6 ttl=250 time=81.6 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=7 ttl=250 time=82.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=8 ttl=250 time=81.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=9 ttl=250 time=76.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=10 ttl=250 time=81.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=11 ttl=250 time=81.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=12 ttl=250 time=81.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=13 ttl=250 time=81.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=14 ttl=250 time=76.3 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=15 ttl=250 time=81.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=16 ttl=250 time=82.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=17 ttl=250 time=76.5 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=18 ttl=250 time=76.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=19 ttl=250 time=76.3 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=20 ttl=250 time=82.6 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.252.62: icmp_seq=21 ttl=250 time=77.0 ms


Attached image wich Icmp.AvgPingTime and Icmp.LastPingTime delivers at the same time.

Seems that divide it by 10 and then round value.


Best regards.