NetXMS Support Forum

2023.06.14 08:31:02.336 *I* [logger            ] Debug level for tag "topology.fdb" set to 6

2023.06.14 08:31:14.866 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-3
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-4
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1002
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1003
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1004
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1005
2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): 0 entries read from dot1qTpFdbTable
2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): 5 entries read from dot1dTpFdbTable
2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1
2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-3
2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-4
2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1002
2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1003
2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1004
2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1005
2023
2023.06.14 08:31:20.710 *I* [logger            ] Debug level for tag "topology.fdb" set to 0

Log from management:
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] **** Poll request sent to server ****
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] Poll request accepted, waiting for outstanding polling requests to complete...
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] Starting topology poll of node [Sw] SWITCH
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] VLAN list successfully retrieved from node
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] Switch forwarding database retrieved
[14.06.2023 08:31:14] Link layer topology retrieved (7 connections found)
[14.06.2023 08:31:15] Updating peer information on interfaces
[14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Gi1/0/10 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME1:Gi0/10
[14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Gi1/0/15 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME2:Gi0/10
[14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Te1/1/1 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME3:Ethernet1/1
[14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Te1/1/2 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME4:Ethernet1/1
[14.06.2023 08:31:15] Link layer topology processed
[14.06.2023 08:31:15] Finished topology poll of node [Sw] SWITCH
[14.06.2023 08:31:15] **** Poll completed successfully ****

Thats the output i got. Hope it helps.

Cisco switch: C9200L-24P-4X (17.3.4b)
Driver: CISCO-GENERIC

NetXMS version 4.3.5

I don't want to hijack a thread, but for example, Cisco C9200L-24P-4X switch peer discovery doesn't work 100%. Only other Cisco switches are discovered, but no other device directly connected to the switch. It broke with a newer version of NetXms, but I don't remember which version exactly.

Hello, is there fix in planning? Cisco switches dont show mac list and connected nodes.

Hello

What could cause this: I have Cisco C2960x-24TS-LL switch, snmp polling is enabled. But in interface tab only other Cisco switches are found (using CDP) and Mikrotik router (using LLDP). But for example servers/cameras are not discovered. Also Topology -> Switch forwarding database is empty.

NetXMS version: 4.3.3

.1.3.111.2.802.1.1.13.1.3.2.0 empty
.1.3.111.2.802.1.1.13.1.4.1.1 empty
.1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1 contains info and mac addresses

Hello

What would be the best way in NetXMS to store device unique id tag, that is also printed on device itself?

It should be possible to search it. And easily display in device page.

Egert

Hello

Is someone monitoring Juniper Srx routers, and checking if main and backup partition have same fw version via NetXms?

How did you achieve this? As far as i know, snmp doesent output this info.

Weekly:
Poller average wait: (min 0, max 3.677k, avg 6.427)
Datacoll average wait: (min 0, max 69, avg 0.011)

ThreadPool.Main
MaxSize: 256
BaseSize: 8

Egert

POLLERS: current load (%): 44. Weekly average (min 6, max 202, avg 49).
DATACOLL: current load (%): 11. Weekly average (min 0, max 49, avg 9).

SYNCER: average wait time(ms): 117 Weekly average (min 39, max 6.419k, avg 198).
MAIN: average wait time(ms): 90.022k Weekly average (min 4.273k, max 117.547k, avg 59.684k).

config:
threadpool.poller.maxsize: 1200 (def 250)
threadpool.discovery.maxsize: 16 (def 64)
Threadpool.datacollector.maxsize: 1200 (def 250)
threadpool.syncer.maxsize: 4 (def 1)

How do these numbers look ?

Hello

Currently running on version 4.2.395 and i noticed that some server performance metrics are high:

Server thread pool SYNCER: usage% - 100
Server thread pool POLLERS: usage% - 60
Server thread pool MAIN: usage% - 100*i looked at weekly history and values mostly didn't change, only pollers went to 100% at 2 times.

Show stats:

Objects: 42898
Monitored nodes: 6824
Collectible DCIs: 18999
Active alarms: 1673
Uptime: 23 days


Is this normal or should i adjust something?

Thanks for the tip, this indeed solved the problem.

Egert

When i created new template + new node, the issue still occured.
Image: https://ibb.co/YT6VvsF
Version: 4.2.395

Hello

Found a bug, when adding node to template and assigning some custom attributes from template via inheritance, node receives them fine. But when i remove node from template, it still keeps the custom attributes. Even shows them with dark backround and inherited from template.

Egert

Hello

Would it be possible to launch default action when double clicking node on network map. For example go to web page or other costum tool. Would save time when we could double click, insetad of right click -> tools -> Costum tool.

Egert

Thanks for the info