Hi All,
I have several TP-Link devices (Archer VR900 ADSL Router, WA901 Wireless Access Point) , the all support snmp v2 (but use a "public" mib).
I am testing NETXMS alongside Zabbix - Unfortunately Zabbix picks up the interfaces on these where as NetXMS does not - What am I doing wrong ?
This is the response
[13.08.2020 19:50:28] **** Poll request sent to server ****
[13.08.2020 19:50:28] Poll request accepted
[13.08.2020 19:50:28] Starting configuration poll for node Folly-VR900-Router
[13.08.2020 19:50:28] Checking node's capabilities...
[13.08.2020 19:50:28] Checking NetXMS agent...
[13.08.2020 19:50:30] Cannot connect to NetXMS agent (Connect failed)
[13.08.2020 19:50:30] Checking SNMP...
[13.08.2020 19:51:29] Checking EtherNet/IP...
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Cannot get device identity via EtherNet/IP (CONNECT FAILED)
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Capability check finished
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Checking interface configuration...
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Unable to get interface list from node
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Interface configuration check finished
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Checking node name
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Node name is OK
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Updating general system hardware information
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Finished configuration poll for node Folly-VR900-Router
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] Node configuration was not changed after poll
[13.08.2020 19:51:31] **** Poll completed successfully ****
The issue is not with interfaces - netxms does not receive anything via SNMP from this device.
Please check if your community string is set up in Configuration->Network Credentials.
For testing you can also use snmp command line tools on the machine where you have NetXMS installed, e.g.:
nxsnmpwalk -v 2c -c public <device_ip> .1.3.6
snmpwalk returns data - what I did was delete the original and add manually this then worked. Unfortunately TP-Link obviously do not implement snmp properly or fully (for example you cannot see the 4 gigabit interfaces).
(this is just an extract)
C:\NetXMS\bin>nxsnmpwalk -v 2c -c Monday1964! 192.168.1.1 .1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 [STRING]: 0.5.0 0.9.1 v0069.0 Build 200624 Beta.68497n
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 [OBJECT IDENTIFIER]: .1.3.6.1.4.1.16972
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 [TIMETICKS]: 60955700
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 [STRING]: Scott Dawson
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 [STRING]: Folly-VR900-Router
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 [STRING]: Downstairs Office
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 [INTEGER]: 72
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.8.0 [TIMETICKS]: 0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.9.1.2.1 [OBJECT IDENTIFIER]: .1.3.6.1.6.3.1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.9.1.3.1 [STRING]: The MIB module for SNMPv2 entities
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.9.1.4.1 [TIMETICKS]: 0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 [INTEGER]: 20
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.2 [INTEGER]: 2
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.4 [INTEGER]: 4
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.8 [INTEGER]: 8
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.16 [INTEGER]: 16
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.17 [INTEGER]: 17
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.19 [INTEGER]: 19
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.20 [INTEGER]: 20
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.2 [STRING]: ifb0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.4 [STRING]: gre0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.8 [STRING]: bcmsw
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.16 [STRING]: br0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.17 [STRING]: tun0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.19 [STRING]: ptm0.101
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.20 [STRING]: ppp1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.2 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.4 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.8 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.16 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.17 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.19 [INTEGER]: 6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.20 [INTEGER]: 23
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.2 [INTEGER]: 1500
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.4 [INTEGER]: 1476
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.8 [INTEGER]: 1500
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.16 [INTEGER]: 1500
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.17 [INTEGER]: 1500
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.19 [INTEGER]: 1500
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.4.20 [INTEGER]: 1480
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.2 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.4 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.8 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.16 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.17 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.19 [GAUGE32]: 100000000
Hi,
is it possible to organize SNMP access for us to few TPLink devices so we can test how server see them and fix any discovered issues?
Best regards,
Victor