NetXMS Support Forum

General => Polls => Topic started by: Alex Kirhenshtein on March 24, 2010, 10:42:47 PM

Poll
Question: You would like to see binary package for:
Option 1: Debian, Ubuntu (.deb) votes: 93
Option 2: RHEL, Centos (.rpm) votes: 68
Option 3: Gentoo (ebuild) votes: 3
Option 4: Generic Linux (.tgz, just bunch of files) votes: 24
Option 5: FreeBSD (.tbz, sutable for pkg_add) votes: 18
Title: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: Alex Kirhenshtein on March 24, 2010, 10:42:47 PM
Hello.

We are planing to provide binary packages for NetXMS, but we need to decide, which OS / Distribution should go first.

Note: most likely that there will be no binary package for Gentoo - only .ebuild, since Gentoo is user-build and completely unpredictable in sense of libraries and their versions.
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: Anders on March 18, 2011, 11:37:10 AM
Hi,

Are there any plans to release .deb-packages for x64 for Debian/Ubuntu?

Thanks.
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: Victor Kirhenshtein on March 20, 2011, 12:01:43 PM
Hi!

Yes, x64 Debian packages will be released soon.

Best regards,
Victor
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: AnRkey on October 31, 2013, 01:24:21 PM
+1 for a Debian repo
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: lindeamon on November 06, 2013, 07:40:55 PM
Personally i use centos x64 so i would like to have rpm built for  both x86 and x64 for centos.
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: Dani@M3T on January 04, 2014, 11:35:17 PM
we use OpenSUSE 13.1 because of the new Hyper-V Gen2 Support
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: possamai on March 05, 2014, 01:04:31 AM
Don't bother with a FreeBSD package.. create a port, not a package.
There is one but it's version 1.0.13
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: tvadakin on April 04, 2014, 05:46:46 AM
I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: possamai on April 07, 2014, 05:07:36 PM
Quote from: tvadakin on April 04, 2014, 05:46:46 AM
I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D

I can make the port for MySQL but I'm not going to test all the other database options.. It's my only machine and I want to keep it clean. Can't promise that I can keep it up2date either..
I'm out of a job now so I have time, but I hope that won't be for long..
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: Victor Kirhenshtein on April 09, 2014, 09:17:27 AM
Even upgrading port to latest release will be great. If test system is a problem, I can provide you access to test virtual machines with FreeBSD. Please contact me directly if you are interested.

Best regards,
Victor
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: possamai on April 09, 2014, 05:04:42 PM
I'll see what I can do. I already have a setup with MySQL so I can start with that.
Title: Re: Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded
Post by: zillo on May 12, 2014, 06:25:36 PM
Hi,

There is a port for 1.2.13 in preparation.
Check http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/188406

I have used it.
I have had to delete "NO_PACKAGE=     yes" line from the Makefile in order to build and install.
It build and install ok, the server is stable.

I have problem with the agent (1.2.13). For different parameters the agent return INTERNAL_ERROR.
An agent log (debug level 9) look like this:

[11-May-2014 11:51:52.658] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "Net.Interface.BytesIn(1)"
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 500 (INTERNAL_ERROR)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 32)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
  ** 004100000000005800002E8000000001
  ** 00000055010000000000003600530079
  ** 007300740065006D002E004D0065006D
  ** 006F00720079002E0050006800790073
  ** 006900630061006C002E005500730065
  ** 0064000000650072
  ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11904 size=88 numFields=1
  ** [    85] STRING "System.Memory.Physical.Used"

[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "System.Memory.Physical.Used"
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 0 (SUCCESS)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 64)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.663] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
  ** 004100000000004800002E8100000001
  ** 00000055010000000000002600530079
  ** 007300740065006D002E004300500055
  ** 002E004C006F00610064004100760067
  ** 0035320033003900
  ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11905 size=72 numFields=1

Maybe somebody have a suggestion.

Thanks,
V.V.