News:

We really need your input in this questionnaire

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Victor Kirhenshtein

#5191
I have fixed this error. Agent compiles both with and without all-static flag. I'm not sure if it will work correctly with ODBC and all-static, because ODBC uses dynamic linking internally to load drivers, but you can check. Agent compiled without all-static should work without problem, but it will depend on system shared libraries - only NetXMS libraries and subagents will be included into nxagentd binary. Updated source package can be downloaded from here: https://netxms.org/download/patches/014/netxms-1.2.2.tar.gz.

Best regards,
Victor
#5192
General Support / Re: "Interfaces" tab
July 30, 2012, 01:46:17 PM
Yes, it should, but due to a bug existed before 1.2.2, some interfaces have stalled peer information. It should be cleared when you connect new devices to ports with wrong information, or when device incorrectly pointed as peer will be moved to yet another port. I'll also consider possibility to add background peer validation in 1.2.3 to clear incorrect peer information.

Best regards,
Victor
#5193
Общие вопросы / Re: баги 1.2.2
July 30, 2012, 12:53:50 PM
Quote from: SKYnv on July 30, 2012, 10:37:07 AM
и еще
4) Netxms добавляет vlan'ы в дерево портов устройства чем неимоверно захламляет его

NetXMS добавляет все интерфейсы, о которых сообщает устройство. Сделать какой-то стандартный алгоритм отсечения "ненужных" интерфейсов не думаю что возможно, к тому-же это сильно зависит от конкретной инсталляции - где-то такие интерфейсы нужны, где-то нет. Можно подумать над добавлением неких фильтров, которые можно будет делать самому, для исключения из базы интерфейсов, которые не нужны. Еще один нюанс, о котором надо помнить - интерфейсы, на которых определены IP адреса, должны быть -иначе нарушится IP топология.
#5194
General Support / Re: Raspberry Pi
July 30, 2012, 10:04:46 AM
You can try to rebuild agent with --disable-iconv option. If this will not help, can you consider giving me shell access to it so I can debug the issue?

Best regards,
Victor
#5195
General Support / Re: "Interfaces" tab
July 30, 2012, 10:03:18 AM
Hi!

"Interfaces" tab is a new feature in 1.2.2, but interface peer tracking is there since some version in 1.1.x branch. This information was shown previously in object overview tab for interface objects. You can clear that by deleting interface object with wrong peer information and running configuration poll - server will rediscover interface and create new interface object without peer information.

Best regards,
Victor
#5196
General Support / Re: stack ports
July 30, 2012, 10:00:13 AM
Hi!

Switch reports interface operational status as 2 (down) for 2 of them and 6 (notPresent) for other two on each unit. NetXMS server translates "notPresent" state into UNKNOWN status, this is why you see some of 10G interfaces as unknown. It's a question if this is a correct interpretation of interface state, or it should be translated into CRITICAL status, as for DOWN state.

Best regards,
Victor
#5197
Общие вопросы / Re: баги 1.2.2
July 30, 2012, 09:47:38 AM
Не смог подключится по SNMP, только на web интерфейс. Было бы очень полезно SNMP доступ получить тоже. По wireless bridge - а как у них выглядят интерфейсы?
#5198
General Support / Re: cisco-esw driver
July 27, 2012, 11:04:47 PM
I start working on that. Support for correct layout will be gradually added to the drivers. This probably will be slow process, as it requires extensible knowledge and/or search on internet for physical port layout of different switch models. But we will move in right direction :)

Best regards,
Victor
#5199
General Support / Re: "Interfaces" tab
July 27, 2012, 11:00:42 PM
Hi!

No, it's actually is/was a bug in NetXMS. Information about connected peer node is stored in interface object itself, and supposed to be cleared when same node found on another interface. This bug should be fixed in 1.2.2, but if node move to another port was discovered before upgrade, peer information on old interface might not be updated. Keep looking if new stalled peer information will appear. If possible, try to do some tests - connect node to one port for few hours, ensure that it is shown on correct port, then reconnect to another port, and check again after few hours - it should corrrectly show node on new interface and nothing on old interface.

Best regards,
Victor
#5200
General Support / Re: Find MAC
July 27, 2012, 10:23:07 AM
Quote from: DanG on July 27, 2012, 07:56:36 AM
What I find strange is that for all Windows PC's the interface object is unknown, NetXMS knows their IP but not their MAC. Windows machines with an agent installed do have correct interface objects, surly I don't have to install an agent on each machine to have it's MAC?

Currently NetXMS can obtain MAC address only directly from device, by SNMP or via agent. I plan to add setting MAC address for nodes without agent or SNMP based on ARP information. Hopefully it will be implemented in version 1.2.3.

Quote from: DanG on July 27, 2012, 07:56:36 AM
BTW, is there a way to obtain information about the progress of the auto-discovery?

No. There are feature request for that.

Best regards,
Victor
#5201
Quote from: djaksons on July 25, 2012, 10:01:17 AM
Хотел мониторить время работы от батарей но в программе нет переменной такого типа

Имеется ввиду TIMETICKS? Это обычный unsigned integer. Поставьте соответствующий тип в DCI, и все будет собираться корректно.
#5202
Quote from: SKYnv on July 26, 2012, 10:30:47 PM
Quote from: Victor Kirhenshtein on July 26, 2012, 10:07:21 PM
Хорошее описание по добавлению параметров получилось. Поставил как отдельный топик.
НУ тогда явно напрашивается раздел Best Practices или Tips and Tricks
Скорее wiki, но там русского раздела еще нет...
#5203
General Support / Re: cisco-esw driver
July 27, 2012, 12:05:52 AM
I'll try to fix it till next release.

Best regards,
Victor
#5204
General Support / Re: "Interfaces" tab
July 26, 2012, 11:18:54 PM
Can it be that said printer was connected to port 20 before? Or it was always in port 2?

Best regards,
Victor
#5205
General Support / Re: stack ports
July 26, 2012, 11:17:10 PM
Either bug, or switch really does not provide state for these ports. Can you do nxsnmpwalk on .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2 and send output to me?

Best regards,
Victor