Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - scuq

#1
thx! is there a ETA for binary/debian build of this next version? ;)
#2
is there a function which I could use in Hook::ConfigurationPoll to disable

routing table polling
network discovery polling
and netxms agent polling

for new nodes?

#3
if (AddrInSubnet($node->ipAddr, "10.16.0.0", "255.255.0.0")) {
return;
}


is this valid syntax?
#4
General Support / Re: need tuning help
February 14, 2013, 02:55:12 PM
thx,

is it possible to turn of routing table pollig  by default, e.g.  for s specific sysobjectid or any other filter? or should i do this with a nxshell script?

br
scuq
#5
General Support / need tuning help
February 14, 2013, 12:28:32 AM
hi,

Total number of objects: 62219
Number of monitored nodes: 1347
Number of collectable DCIs: 1354

cpu usage is really high, it seems like it's even higher as soon as a console-client connects:

CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual  CPU  E2200  @ 2.20GHz

disk io, and memory seems to be ok.

i'm using postgres (tried 8.4 and 9.1) on ubuntu 12.04

what's your recommendation for NumberOf*Pollers?

br
scuq
#6
General Support / Re: (Active) Discovery stuck
February 10, 2013, 05:38:10 PM
ok, i'll try this.

a last question to discovery, is a custom filtering possible based on parts of the snmpSysName or dns-name of the node, this would be great, e.g. in hpov we use the prefix N* as discovery/node add filter, because all our network devices sysnames are beginning with "N" or "n".

many thanks.
br scuq
#7
General Support / Re: (Active) Discovery stuck
February 10, 2013, 05:10:34 PM
ok, now i'm getting a lot of "AcceptNewNode", not for the range i'm waiting for, but for nodes in other subnets which also needs more discovery,

AcceptNewNode(10.254.0.80): auto filter - range check result is 0

but this node (10.254.0.80) is no network device, it's a client pc without snmp, is the above message just the notification that this ip is pingable and would be accepted by the filter if it would have snmp running?
#8
General Support / Re: (Active) Discovery stuck
February 10, 2013, 04:48:50 PM
i've installed the x64 .deb package on ubuntu 12.04, and started it with the init script (/etc/init.d/netxmsd)

well as above mentioned i've discovered some parts of the subnet, e.g. the router in 10.255.0.0/16.

in my active discovery definition are the ranges

10.255.1.200-10.255.1.254
10.255.2.200-10.255.2.254

this are the ranges where the mgmt-ips of the access switches are. the access switches are pingable from the server hosting the netxmsd and also walkable by snmp (no firewall in path). turning debug to 5 show something called "Discovery poll for node" but just for nodes already added "rereading" their routing tables.

i don't see a discovery of new nodes, is it possible to trigger the active icmp/snmp discovery of a specific range?
is there a limit for the number of entries of "active disocvery targets"?

many thx.

br
scuq
#9
General Support / Re: Disable 802.1x?
February 10, 2013, 01:50:55 PM
thx a lot, i'll try a compile, if all other hiccups are stashed away
#10
General Support / (Active) Discovery stuck
February 10, 2013, 01:47:26 PM
i tested netxmsd with some nodes, now i've extended the active discovery and filter ranges, but somehow no new nodes are added,
"show stat" shows 209 node since 2 days,

active discovery targets are set to ranges like
10.255.1.200-10.255.1.254
10.255.2.200-10.255.2.254

filter is now "open" only "accept node if it has snmp agent" is set, but still no new nodes, any hint on this?

thx.
#11
General Support / Disable 802.1x?
February 08, 2013, 05:07:51 PM
is it possible to turn off 802.1x polling?

I see a lot of "Checking 802.1x state for" in the logfile.
#12
Feature Requests / Interface expected state
February 08, 2013, 04:40:26 PM
is it possible to set the default "interface expected state" for new devices?

it would be perfect so set it via a filtering script for example
if the ifAlias, ifName or a other pollable interface property contains a certain string -> set it to UP, DOWN or IGNORE

but if I could change the global default to IGORE this would also be fine, i'll try to recreate our hp-nnm monitoring which currently is monitoring
1500 access-switches, it's really annoying to set the expected interface state to ignore for all access-devices. i've tried it with a sql-query on the
database, it worked but i think there must be a more sophisticated way to do this.

thx
#13
we are currently building our new core with cisco devices,

the following devices are recognized as GENERIC

Nexus 7000:
System Description=Cisco NX-OS(tm) n7000, Software (n7000-s2-dk9), Version 6.1(2), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 2002-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled 9/7/2012 13:00:00
SNMP Object ID=.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.1147

Nexus 5000:
System Description=Cisco NX-OS(tm) n5000, Software (n5000-uk9), Version 5.2(1)N1(2a), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 2002-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Device Manager Version 6.1(1),  Compiled 10/21/2012 21:00:00
SNMP Object ID=.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.1038

Catalyst 4500X:
System Description=Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.04.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Wed 0
SNMP Object ID=.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1732

are you working on drivers for this devices or could anyone help me to get this done?